Directors and Insolvency – where do you stand Skip to main content

Directors and insolvency – where do you stand?

It has been settled law for many years that as a company approached insolvency there was a point when the interests of the creditors became paramount. From this point forward the directors are in danger of creating a personal liability for any additional loss suffered by the company and creditors.

Producing a test that defined the moment when creditor’s interest duty engaged has always been problematical for judges.

This issue reared its head again in the case of BTI AT Industries PLC v Sequana SA (“Sequana”) a decision of the Court of Appeal handed down on 6th February 2019. The forum in this case was that of section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986. This section of the Act permits the Court to review and overturn transactions designed to put assets beyond the reach of creditors.

Section 423 of Act provides a cause of action, under the heading of “Transactions defrauding creditors”.  This heading can be misleading as it is not in fact necessary to show a dishonest or fraudulent purpose in order to establish a claim under s423. 

Two requirements must be established:

  1. The claimant must show that a person (a company or individual) has entered into a transaction at undervalue.  This will include an outright gift, or a transaction in which the consideration received was significantly less than that given.
  2. The claimant must show that the transaction was entered into for the purpose of putting assets beyond the reach of creditors or future creditors, or otherwise prejudicing their interests.  The purpose need not be the sole purpose, or even the dominant purpose. It is sufficient to show that the purpose of avoiding creditors was at least one of the substantial purposes of the transaction.  It is not necessary that the creditors in question be in existence at the time the transaction is entered into.

The relief available to a successful claimant will be orders restoring the position to what it would have been but for the transaction.  The court’s discretion in terms of relief is wide, and can (subject to a “good faith” exception) include orders against any third party that has received a benefit as a result of the transaction. A very significant liability can result.

The Court of Appeal decided that the duty arises when the directors know or should know that the company is or is likely to become insolvent (which probably means cash flow insolvent). ‘Likely’, for these purposes, means more probable and not some lower test.

The fact that the facts were exceptional does not meant that the test will not apply in more routine circumstances. It will also apply in wrongful trading claims. This is a case with real practical consequences for directors in all companies in financial difficulty.

If you require legal assistance for dealing with insolvency please contact us by email djb@winstonsolicitors.co.uk or call 0113 218 5423.

Client feedback

We are so grateful to Sidraa for all her support during our recent property purchase. She kept us informed and up to date every step of the way, always responding promptly and sharing information clearly and in a timely manner.Sidraa worked incredibly hard behind the scenes, handling so much of the legal side with care and efficiency — often without us even realising just how much she was doing. Her dedication and thoroughness made the whole process feel smooth and stress-free, which we deeply appreciate.Thanks to her professionalism and attention to detail, what is usually a complex and sometimes overwhelming process felt straightforward and well-managed. We couldn’t have asked for a better solicitor and wouldn’t hesitate to recommend Sidraa to anyone buying a property.
Sahid
Winston's supported me with their professional services. They were very swift in responding to my initial enquiry, then very quickly put me in touch with someone with the correct professional experience. They explained every step of the process and made the whole exeriance feel very easy.
Andrew
I would highly recommend Winston Solicitors to anyone in need of reliable legal support. Sidraa was outstanding throughout our entire process—reliable, diligent, informative, and genuinely kind. She kept us consistently updated, always took the time to explain things clearly, and was readily available to speak with us directly whenever we had questions. Her professionalism and personal touch made a potentially stressful process feel smooth and manageable.
Jacob C
Great service by Winston Solicitors - was communicated at every step - would recommend both Tom and Sidraa for their professionalism
Anonymous
We had our Wills updated and redrafted very recently. We received a really good service from Emily. She gave us very good advice, was extremly communicative and responsive and enabled us to get the Wills we wanted.
Anonymous
Excellent
Anna L
I have recently worked with Samira and Dervinder, and I couldn't be more satisfied with the service I received. From the very beginning, they were both professional, responsive, and extremely knowledgeable. They took the time to explain every step of the legal process in clear and understandable terms, and their attention to detail and genuine care for achieving the best possible outcome truly stood out. 10 out of 10!
Joanne
A very good conveyancing service. Clear and direct communication throughout the process. I would recommend Winston's solicitors if you intend to buy or sell a property.
Mr G
Contact David