Directors and Insolvency – where do you stand Skip to main content

Directors and insolvency – where do you stand?

It has been settled law for many years that as a company approached insolvency there was a point when the interests of the creditors became paramount. From this point forward the directors are in danger of creating a personal liability for any additional loss suffered by the company and creditors.

Producing a test that defined the moment when creditor’s interest duty engaged has always been problematical for judges.

This issue reared its head again in the case of BTI AT Industries PLC v Sequana SA (“Sequana”) a decision of the Court of Appeal handed down on 6th February 2019. The forum in this case was that of section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986. This section of the Act permits the Court to review and overturn transactions designed to put assets beyond the reach of creditors.

Section 423 of Act provides a cause of action, under the heading of “Transactions defrauding creditors”.  This heading can be misleading as it is not in fact necessary to show a dishonest or fraudulent purpose in order to establish a claim under s423. 

Two requirements must be established:

  1. The claimant must show that a person (a company or individual) has entered into a transaction at undervalue.  This will include an outright gift, or a transaction in which the consideration received was significantly less than that given.
  2. The claimant must show that the transaction was entered into for the purpose of putting assets beyond the reach of creditors or future creditors, or otherwise prejudicing their interests.  The purpose need not be the sole purpose, or even the dominant purpose. It is sufficient to show that the purpose of avoiding creditors was at least one of the substantial purposes of the transaction.  It is not necessary that the creditors in question be in existence at the time the transaction is entered into.

The relief available to a successful claimant will be orders restoring the position to what it would have been but for the transaction.  The court’s discretion in terms of relief is wide, and can (subject to a “good faith” exception) include orders against any third party that has received a benefit as a result of the transaction. A very significant liability can result.

The Court of Appeal decided that the duty arises when the directors know or should know that the company is or is likely to become insolvent (which probably means cash flow insolvent). ‘Likely’, for these purposes, means more probable and not some lower test.

The fact that the facts were exceptional does not meant that the test will not apply in more routine circumstances. It will also apply in wrongful trading claims. This is a case with real practical consequences for directors in all companies in financial difficulty.

If you require legal assistance for dealing with insolvency please contact us by email djb@winstonsolicitors.co.uk or call 0113 218 5423.

Client feedback

They were very good at keeping me up to date and letting me know the progress of my claim
Charley
I would definitely highly recommend the efficiency & good communication thry have & have had several properties successfully completed with
Mr H
Excellent local solicitors would recommend. You can call in the office car parking available and receptionists very helpful if you need help. Dealt with them before, excellent.
Ian
Friendly, easy to understand and comunitive. Would happily recommend they to others.
John
Winston Solicitors was recommended to me, as this was my first time buying a house and didn’t know what to expect. They made the process very easy and I did not have to worry about any of the process as I got to track it every step of the way. Samantha also kept me updated and any queries were replied to promptly. I will definitely be using again in the future and recommend everyone I know.
Mr Michel
I can’t speak highly enough of Sidraa at Winston Solicitors for her exceptional support throughout my house purchase. From start to finish, she has been absolutely brilliant. Her prompt responses, attention to detail, and professionalism made a stressful process feel manageable and smooth. This is actually the second time I’ve used Winston Solicitors, and once again, they have been great. Consistent, reliable, and professional and Sidraa in particular truly went above and beyond. She was always kind, polite, and incredibly approachable, nothing ever felt like too much trouble. Even when dealing with a particularly difficult chain and the added pressure of a new stamp duty deadline, she worked tirelessly to get everything done on time. She responded to queries even out of hours, always called back when she said she would, and genuinely made me feel like a priority. What really stood out to me was her dedication — despite having preplanned annual leave for Eid, she still tried to keep things moving, which shows how committed she is to her clients. Her communication was clear and consistent, and she made a complex process feel a lot less daunting. I felt fully supported and in safe hands throughout. If you're looking for a solicitor who is professional, caring, and truly exceptional at what she does, Sidraa at Winston Solicitors is the one to go to. I’m incredibly grateful for everything she did and wouldn’t hesitate to work with her again or recommend her to others. - April 2025
I Younas, Leeds
I would really like to thank both Amr and his assistant Joe. Throughout the whole process they kept me informed, nothing was ever too much. I am a first time buyer, this was a very stressful time but both members of staff made me feel at ease that it would get sorted. Thank you so much both!
Y Hinton, Leeds
Leasa and Julie were fantastic at helping us buy and sell our house. They were punctual, and kept us up to date with what was going on. Their online platform was clear to follow. Leasa's email response time was rapid, this was incredibly valuable. - March 2025
J Salthouse, Leeds
Contact David