Skip to main content
Legal news

Employment Appeals Tribunal

Jonathan Winston Jonathan Winston
2 min read
This blog is more than 13 years old

Employee victimised for raising multiple grievances

Woodhouse v West North West Homes Leeds Limited has recently been heard in the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) and the judgment has been delivered.

Employers beware! Many of you will no doubt have sympathy with the Respondent in this case.

By way of background:

Over a period of four years Mr Woodhouse lodged ten internal grievances with his employer alleging race discrimination.

In addition he also brought seven employment tribunal claims against his employer.

Almost all were found to be empty allegations without any proper evidential basis or any grounds for his suspicion.

The employer dismissed Mr Woodhouse eventually due to an alleged breakdown in trust and confidence. The employer confirmed to Mr Woodhouse that his numerous allegations of discrimination had been taken seriously but were ultimately not upheld following thorough investigations. The employer also did not believe there could be a sustainable working relationship going forward.

On the face of it this is not an unreasonable argument.

Mr Woodhouse claimed again however in the employment tribunal and as part of his claim pleaded victimisation on the grounds that he was treated less favourably than others would have been treated by reason that he made repeated complaints of race discrimination.

The claim was heard by the tribunal in the first instance and the tribunal found that it was not victimisation because the employer would similarly have dismissed any employee who had brought a similar number of meritless grievances and claims. In other words the employer did not treat Mr Woodhouse less favourably because of his race.

However the EAT held that the tribunal’s decision was wrong. The EAT instead held that the grievances and the tribunal claims were “protected acts” and that Mr Woodhouse was dismissed because he made those protected acts. There was in the EATs opinion no suggestion of bad faith, which would have prevented the grievances amounting to protected acts.

This case highlights that an employer should not dismiss any employee who makes a series of misguided grievances pertaining to any type of discrimination.

What advice can we give to employers with the above case in mind?

  1. Manage grievances properly and in a timely manner
  2. Train managers in equal opportunities and update training regularly
  3. Implement and review regularly your equal opportunities policy.
  4. Implement a bullying and harassment policy
  5. Take legal advice as soon as you are aware that there could be a potential claim
  6. Consider taking out insurance against claims.

If all else fails consider a compromise (soon to be known settlement agreement)!

If you would like to discuss this, our insurance backed advice scheme or any other employment related matter please contact the employment team.

Client feedback

I chose Winston Solicitors to deal with my wife's estate on the recommendation of a family member. I was very satisfied with the friendly attitude of the team. Everything was dealt with as quickly as possible bearing in mind that some documents needed to dealt with by a family member in America. i was kept informed of progress every step of the way. Wonderful service.
David
Michelle and Aishah were both very professional and helpful. This wasn't a straightforward conveyance but they had the relevant expertise to complete the sale without a problem.
Caroline
I used Winston Solicitors to sell our house and they were brilliant. Amr dealt with all the paperwork quickly and kept us updated the whole time. They made the entire sale smooth and stress free. We would definitely use them again and recommending them to family and friends.
Mohammed
I have worked with Winston Solicitors on a number of different legal matters, most recently conveyancing. On each occasion, they have been professional, friendly and helpful throughout. Whether providing advice, responding to queries, or simply keeping me updated on progress, their communication has always been excellent.I would have no hesitation in recommending Winston Solicitors and would be very happy to use their services again in the future.
Anonymous
My wife and I recently contacted Winstons Solicitors, with a view to update our Wills and talk about Lasting Power of Attorneys.We were introduced to Emily Spencer (Solicitor), who was friendly, very knowledgeable and talked to us at length with good communications and understanding of what we were asking for. Emily also took her time to go through our Wills and explaining about Lasting Power of Attorneys and what this meant regarding the health and financial sides.Emily has a professional manner and puts you at ease when explaining the legal side of Wills and Lasting Power of Attorneys, she goes through things carefully with understanding.She has been accessible throughout the processes, helpful with suggestions and replies to emails with effciency.Without hesitation we would recommend Winstons Solicitors, our experience has been smooth and faultless. It has been a pleasure dealing with Emily and Winstons Solicitors.
Kevin
Leasa Foster was extremely efficient and professional in handing out purchase.She was very experienced and able to advise us on potential legal issues before we even started progressing with searches.I would highly recommend her services.
Michael
Very thorough service and great communication throughout the whole process.
"Ruth"
We used Winstons to sort out our late fathers life interest trust. Emily was brilliant...very efficient, organised and knowledgeable.It was a complicated issue to us but Emily dealt with it quickly and efficiently...taking away the stress for us.
Mary
Contact Jonathan