Skip to main content
Legal news

Government’s response to Family Justice Review

Jonathan Winston Jonathan Winston
2 min read

The Government’s response to the Norgrove report which recommended a number of reforms to the family justice system has just been published. The Government has accepted most of the recommendations within the review which fundamentally aim to tackle delays in those cases involving children in the care of Local Authorities, and to provide better support for separating parents in private law cases.

The Government takes the view that all private law children cases should be resolved out of court. The Government’s belief is that in most circumstances, a mother and father working together are the best people to make arrangements for their children following separation. It therefore proposes to introduce a mandatory legislative requirement that if you want to make an application to the Court about your children, you must first attend a mediation session to be given information about mediation as an alternative process.

The Government supports the idea of Parenting Agreements for such couples, to provide a basic framework for the care of children following separation.

The Government has stopped short of making any legislative recommendation about shared parenting being a presumption for those couples separating and divorcing with children. The Norgrove report recommended extreme caution about such legislation being introduced and stated that lessons should be learnt from other countries where shared parenting was automatically granted upon separation and divorce: The fear is that this gives rise to a presumption that children will spent equal time with both parents, which may not necessarily be in a particular child’s best interests, depending upon family circumstances. However the Government has said that it wants to introduce legislation about ensuring children have an ongoing relationship with both parents after separation.

The Government’s basic approach for children cases is twofold:

  1. To try and put systems in place to support families so that they do not need to go to court
  2. If they do end up in Court, to ensure that the legal procedure they face is quick and straightforward

A new website and telephone line is to be set up during 2012 to provide parents with better information and access to support services, when separating and divorcing.

Client feedback

Excellent. Engaged, honest and quick throughout. When they said something would be done, it was. Couldn't be happier.
Samuel
Many thanks to Monika and staff at Street Lane office for their help and understanding at what was a very sad time for me. So efficient.Ann Campbell
Ann
Monika made the whole Wil process very simple & was more than happy to explain any concerns we had.
Jane
was a CIACA case, great service, professional, kept informed all the way
Faris
I found Sidraa to be very thorough, proactively raising questions about the conveyance even before I had asked her myself. All communication was clear and regular updates provided, which was very helpful.It was a stressful process (what house move isn’t!)due to an issue dragging on, no fault on the Solicitors’ part but meant exchange and completion in quick succession! Ultimately, Sidraa and Tom worked very hard to achieve the completion date everyone wanted so thank you 🙏
Dorothy
Emily was a very patient and supportive lady, as we were not very clued in to dealing with some of the internet issues and she guided us through it.Emily made altering our wills a breeze, would use this firm Winston solicitors 100 percent for all our business.
Tina
Leasa and the team at Winston solicitors have been really good. Leasa was very thorough in her work helping me with my house purchase. I can highly recommend her and Winston solicitors for conveyancing.
Maria
Winston Solicitors are the best solicitor firm I have dealt with. They helped sell my house. Sidraa and Tom were always communicating with me and turned things round quickly when I was going out of the country. I would definitely use them again and that’s not the case usually with solicitor firms.
Rob
Contact us