Skip to main content
Legal news

Law changes in 2012

Jonathan Winston Jonathan Winston
7 min read
This blog is more than 14 years old

2012 is shaping up to be another fascinating year in the legal world and the areas of family, employment, personal injury and conveyancing will all be affected by changes in 2012 but with announcements by the Prime Minister on an intention to “kill off the health and safety culture for good” it is likely to be health and safety which attracts most of the headlines. David Cameron says that he has asked the Health and Safety Executive to bring forward to the end of 2012 a timetable for removing regulations which are deemed to be unnecessary.

Commercial law -Health and safety laws

The government has said that it is committed to simplifying health and safety legislation for small businesses within the coming year and it is aiming to ensure that properly managed low-risk businesses no longer need to be visited by inspectors. It is also to form a new “challenge panel” which allows businesses to overturn immediately the decision of health and safety inspectors if they have got it wrong.

The moves are part of the government’s responses to the Lofstedt review, which published its findings late last year. It has, for the most part, accepted the findings and said that it will simplify health and safety legislation for small businesses while it will also seek to ensure that businesses receive appropriate guidance from the Health and Safety Executive on whether they need to consider specific health and safety advice.

It is also hoped that in future years, possibly as soon as 2013, all unnecessary regulations will be revoked with approved codes of practice to give businesses clear examples of how to comply with the law. It also aims, by that year, to see that all self-employed people, whose work does not pose a threat to others, will be exempt from health and safety legislation, a step that the government claims will remove unnecessary bureaucracy.

Professor Lofstedt says that his reforms generally target needless bureaucracy but there is no need for a radical reshaping of the laws as they stand, as they offer “vital protection to employees and the public”.

Family law

Least in the area of family lawwhere 2011 saw a great deal of activity, in particular with the Family Procedure Rules coming into force in April last year. These have provided a single set of rules for family proceedings in the High Court, county courts and magistrates’ courts and included in them has been a requirement for separating couples to be assessed as to whether mediation may be a more suitable way to resolve their differences as opposed to going to court.

Also, the Law Commission set up a consultation on the future of pre-nuptial agreements which is now pending a report, while a regulatory framework for fostering comes into force in April which will include national minimum standards and fostering services regulations.

The Supreme Court also widened the definition of “domestic violence” last year by ruling that it included psychological as well as physical abuse. This followed the court’s decision in the case of Yemshaw v London Borough of Hounslow, where it found that housing officers had been wrong to decide that a woman was not eligible for their help because her husband had not actually hit her or threatened to do so.

As for 2012, it is likely that there will be a continued focus on mediation as a way to settle many disputes in this field, as well as other forms of dispute resolution such as arbitration, particularly because of the heightened cost of taking cases to court. With legal fees in mind it is also quite possible that the New Year will see more litigants in person as more people decide not to pay for the legal advice of a firm of solicitors, opting instead to go it alone, a strategy of course which is not without risk.

2012 will also see a review of the Mediation Information and Assessment Meetings which were introduced last year, which will determine whether or not they have proved to be an effective way of settling disputes. There is also likely to be some clarity introduced to the system of child support after a review which was carried out by the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission.

Employment law

Government plans in the area of employment law include the introduction of fees for employment tribunals which have been announced by the Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly. As it stands the taxpayer foots the bill for the £84m cost of running the tribunals but under new proposals, those who want to use the system will have to make a financial contribution, though the government wants to ensure that it remains an access to justice for those on low income.

The government says it wants people to pay a reasonable amount towards the costs of their case and it believes the changes may well act as an incentive to businesses and workers to settle problems earlier and avoid the case going to a tribunal in the first case.

A consultation will take place, which will finish by March, with any agreed changes not coming into force before 2013/14. It is looking into two options in particular: the first will see an initial fee of between £150 and £200 for someone wanting to start a claim with a fee of between £250 and £1,250 then being payable if the claim goes to a hearing. There would be no limit to the maximum award.

The second option sees a single fee of between £200 and £600 being payable but this would limit the eventual award to a maximum of £30,000. It is hoped that the proposed changes would lead to both sides in the case considering carefully whether the matter can be resolved satisfactorily without the need to go to a tribunal.

In other matters the Employment Rights (Increase of Limits) Order 2011 will come into force at the start of February and will raise the limit on some employment tribunal awards. The maximum award for unfair dismissal goes up by about £4,000 to £72,300, while the maximum of a week’s pay to calculate a statutory redundancy payment and the basic and additional awards for unfair dismissal goes up from £400 to £430.

Meanwhile, a new Parental Leave Directive comes into force on March 8 and will increase the permitted period of parental leave from three to four months, while the following month will see the standard rate of statutory maternity, paternity and adoption pay increase from £128.73 to £135.45 per week.

2012 will also see changes to pensions law which will affect all employers who employ at least one worker. New employer duties will see them having to automatically enrol certain workers into a pension scheme, making contributions on their worker’s behalf, registering with the Pensions Regulator and giving information to workers about the changes and how they will be affected.

Personal injury law

Some of the changes in personal injury law were contained in a report written by Lord Justice Jackson on reforms in civil law, which was commissioned by the last Labour government. Amongst a number of recommendations which have been taken up by the coalition government there will be big changes to conditional fee agreements where payments for general damages will rise by 10% in return for lawyers subsequently recovering the fees from their winning clients rather than the losing defendants. Fees for claimant lawyers, when successful, will be capped at 25%.

It is hoped that the changes will reduce the costs for losing defendants as, under the present system, they pay more in legal fees than in damages due to the time it can take for cases to come before a judge.

The significance of the proposed changes, if they become law, may see fewer CFAs with a recent poll saying that 69% of firms questioned admitted that if the plans were to be pushed through they would only offer CFAs on very big or strong claims. Meanwhile 88% said that the changes would inhibit the ability of genuine cases to receive justice. So, despite the proposals being included in the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill, it is clear that there is considerable disquiet over the proposed reforms for conditional fee agreements.

Conveyancing

In housing a significant change will be the removal of Stamp Duty Land Tax exemption for first-time buyers. SDLT relief is still available for first-time buyers on all residential properties bought on or after 25 March 2010 and before 25 of March this year.

It is only available to those who have never previously owned a property either in the UK or elsewhere, where they intend for the property to be their only or main home and is only applicable in cases where the cost of the property is £250,000 or less. So, those wanting to get onto the property ladder, have until March to do so without having to pay Stamp Duty.

Client feedback

Sidraa and Paulo were brilliant and faultless. We have gone through the conveyencing process twice before and found the whole experience very frustrating. It was refreshing and very pleasing to find that the team at Winston made sure we were fully informed as things progressed, responded promptly to all of our requests and were friendly and approachable throughout. Highly recommend.
Anonymous
I highly recommend the services by Winston Solicitors. My solicitor went above and beyond to complete the conveyancing process during my house purchase. She always remained accessible and was available to answer my queries at all times. Her instructions were always crystal clear and i was continously updated to ensure i am aware of any progress. Winston Solicitors should be your first choice if you are wanting to work with highly professional individuals.
Nusrhat
Really efficient and helpful, especially Amanda and Olivia. This was a whole new experience for me and other people gave me much longer dates for expected completion whereas Olivia managed to complete everything in a comparatively quick time even when unexpected situations arose, thank you.
Anonymous
Really helpful and responsive. Used them for my remortgage which included taking someone off the deed and making the mortgage for me only and it was all very smooth and I felt very well informed throughout. Felt like good value for money. Would use again.
Katrina
Fantastic experience!After a couple of previous houses unfortunately fell through over the last year, alongside a few other issues, we ended up dealing with four different conveyancers over a two-year period. Our frustrating experiences with the first three corporate firms are what ultimately pushed me to go local and choose a smaller company and I am so glad I did!The entire process with this firm was incredibly smooth. Michelle replied promptly to every single query and the service was still very reasonably priced. Even our estate agents remarked on how impressed they were with Michelle's quick responses and ease of communication.Whenever I had a question, I knew it would be answered often on the exact same day via email and we received constant, transparent updates as milestones were completed. I vastly preferred this direct, human communication over the overly complex online portals I had to use with past firms.I would highly recommend Michelle and this firm to anyone looking to buy a house, especially first-time buyers who want a stress-free experience. Thank you so much!
Miss Dawson
Recently I have used the services of Winston Solicitors to deal with my wife's estate and to update my will. In both cases everything was explained in straightforward language and so was easy to understand. Things were dealt with promptly and I was always kept informed of progress. The friendly approach of members of the team made a difficult situation much easier to deal with. My family will certainly seek the services of Winstons when required in the future.
David
Amazing service from start to finish, Our questions were answered quickly and there were no holds up from our side of the house sale what so ever. Would 100% recommend and use in the future. Special thank you to Samantha & Aishah.
Robyn
We were really impressed with the service that we received from both Leasa and Julie. The process was efficient, communication was great and we liked the online portal where you could see the progress of the sale/purchase easily. Despite some delays from our buyer’s solicitor, both Leasa and Julie seemed to push this daily for us to complete on time. We would recommend Winston’s to others and will use them in the future if we move again!
Charlotte
Contact us